Next Plan: Rencana Tahap Selanjutnya
Status Saat Ini
Completed
- [x] Literature review & research (CG, TH, NTM, IE)
- [x] Identifikasi research gap
- [x] Pengembangan kerangka konseptual CG-TH-NTM-IE
- [x] Pembuatan 20 propositions
- [x] Dokumentasi di
research/ directory
Pending
- [ ] Methodology design
- [ ] Formal literature review
- [ ] Conceptual framework refinement
- [ ] Data collection instruments
- [ ] Expert validation
- [ ] Draft writing
Opsi Tahap Selanjutnya
Opsi 1: Methodology Design
- Rancang metodologi penelitian detail
- Buat interview guide untuk stakeholder
- Desain survey questionnaire
- Rencana case study Indonesia
Opsi 2: Formal Literature Review
- Susun literature review formal (chapter tersendiri)
- Organisasi berdasarkan tema & kronologi
- Analisis kritis setiap perspektif
Opsi 3: Conceptual Framework Refinement
- Perbaiki model CG-TH-NTM-IE berdasarkan feedback
- Buat visualisasi yang lebih detail
- Definisikan variabel & indikator
Opsi 4: Draft Writing
- Mulai menulis draf tesis/kertas ilmiah
- Struktur: Introduction → Literature → Framework → Methodology → (nanti: Results)
Opsi 5: Expert Validation
- Siapkan presentasi framework
- Identifikasi pakar untuk review
- Rencana FGD/depth interview
Phase 1: Methodology Design (Minggu 1-4)
1.1 Research Questions Formalization
| No |
Research Question |
Justifikasi |
| RQ1 |
Bagaimana CG memfasilitasi TH interactions dalam tata kelola talenta STEM di Indonesia? |
Mengisi gap CG-TH |
| RQ2 |
Bagaimana integrasi NTM dengan CG meningkatkan efektivitas program talenta STEM? |
Mengisi gap CG-NTM |
| RQ3 |
Bagaimana TH interactions memperkuat IE untuk talenta STEM di Indonesia? |
Mengisi gap TH-IE |
| RQ4 |
Bagaimana model integrasi CG-TH-NTM-IE berdampak pada GII Indonesia? |
Mengisi gap integrasi |
1.2 Research Design
| Komponen |
Pilihan |
Justifikasi |
| Paradigma |
Pragmatisme |
Mixed methods untuk governance study |
| Desain |
Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → QUAL) |
Validasi kuantitatif, eksplorasi kualitatif |
| Waktu |
Cross-sectional dengan longitudinal elements |
Feasibility + dampak jangka panjang |
| Unit Analisis |
Multi-level (nasional, sektoral, organisasi) |
Kompleksitas governance Indonesia |
1.3 Population & Sampling
| Level |
Populasi |
Sampel |
Teknik |
| Nasional |
Gugus Tugas MTN (13+ K/L) |
5-7 kementerian |
Purposive |
| Sektoral |
Universitas, industri, pemerintah daerah |
10-15 organisasi |
Stratified |
| Individu |
Pejabat, akademisi, pelaku industri |
30-50 responden |
Snowball |
1.4 Data Collection Methods
| Metode |
Variabel |
Instrumen |
Timeline |
| Survey |
Drivers, Outcomes, NTM Implementation |
Kuesioner (Likert scale) |
Bulan 5-7 |
| Interview |
CGR, Collaborative Dynamics, TH |
Guide (semi-structured) |
Bulan 4-6 |
| FGD |
Stakeholder perceptions |
Focus group guide |
Bulan 6-7 |
| Dokumen |
System Context, Policy |
Analisis dokumen |
Bulan 3-5 |
| Observasi |
Collaborative Actions |
Observation protocol |
Bulan 5-7 |
1.5 Data Analysis Methods
| Metode |
Data |
Tools |
Output |
| Descriptive Statistics |
Survey |
SPSS/R |
Distribusi variabel |
| Inferential Statistics |
Survey |
AMOS/PLS |
Path analysis, SEM |
| Thematic Analysis |
Interview/FGD |
NVivo/Atlas.ti |
Temuan kualitatif |
| Content Analysis |
Dokumen |
Manual coding |
Policy analysis |
| Cross-case Analysis |
Multi-case |
Pattern matching |
Generalisasi |
Phase 2: Instrument Development (Minggu 3-6)
2.1 Survey Questionnaire
| Section |
Items |
Sumber |
| A. Demographics |
5 items |
Background responden |
| B. System Context |
8 items |
Adapted Emerson et al. (2012) |
| C. CGR Implementation |
12 items |
Adapted Ansell & Gash (2008) |
| D. TH Interactions |
10 items |
Adapted Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff |
| E. NTM Implementation |
12 items |
Berdasarkan Perpres 108/2024 |
| F. Innovation Ecosystem |
10 items |
Adapted Isenberg (2011) |
| G. Outcomes |
8 items |
GII indicators |
Total: 65 items
2.2 Interview Guide
| Section |
Pertanyaan |
Waktu |
| Opening |
Perkenalan, tujuan penelitian |
5 menit |
| Background |
Pengalaman responden |
10 menit |
| CG Perspective |
Kolaborasi lintas kementerian |
20 menit |
| TH Perspective |
Interaksi U-I-G |
20 menit |
| NTM Perspective |
Implementasi DBMTN |
20 menit |
| IE Perspective |
Ekosistem inovasi |
15 menit |
| Integrated Perspective |
Integrasi keempat perspektif |
15 menit |
| Closing |
Ringkasan, follow-up |
5 menit |
Total: ~110 menit
2.3 FGD Guide
| Session |
Peserta |
Topik |
Waktu |
| Session 1 |
Kementerian (5-6 orang) |
Koordinasi CGR |
120 menit |
| Session 2 |
Akademisi (5-6 orang) |
TH di Indonesia |
120 menit |
| Session 3 |
Pelaku industri (5-6 orang) |
IE & talent needs |
120 menit |
Phase 3: Expert Validation (Minggu 5-8)
3.1 Delphi Method
| Round |
Objektif |
Output |
| Round 1 |
Eksplorasi awal |
Temuan awal, rekomendasi |
| Round 2 |
Validasi framework |
Konsensus expert |
| Round 3 |
Finalisasi |
Framework final |
3.2 Expert Selection
| Kategori |
Jumlah |
Kriteria |
| CG Experts |
3-4 |
Publikasi CG di Indonesia |
| TH Experts |
3-4 |
Peneliti TH/innovation |
| NTM Experts |
2-3 |
Pejabat/akademisi talent management |
| IE Experts |
2-3 |
Innovation ecosystem/entrepreneurship |
| Policy Makers |
2-3 |
Pejabat K/L terkait |
Total: 12-17 experts
3.3 Validation Instruments
| Instrumen |
Aspek |
Skala |
| Content Validity |
Relevansi, kejelasan |
1-4 Likert |
| Construct Validity |
Keterkaitan variabel |
1-4 Likert |
| Face Validity |
Keterbacaan, pemahaman |
Open-ended |
Phase 4: Pilot Study (Minggu 7-10)
4.1 Pilot Objectives
- Menguji instrumen (reliabilitas, validitas)
- Mengidentifikasi masalah prosedural
- Memperkirakan waktu yang dibutuhkan
- Melatih tim peneliti
4.2 Pilot Scope
| Komponen |
Target |
Sampel |
| Survey |
Uji reliabilitas |
30-50 responden |
| Interview |
Uji guide |
5-7 responden |
| FGD |
Uji prosedur |
1 sesi (5-6 orang) |
4.3 Pilot Evaluation
| Kriteria |
Indikator |
Target |
| Reliability |
Cronbach’s Alpha |
≥ 0.70 |
| Validity |
Content Validity Index |
≥ 0.80 |
| Feasibility |
Waktu implementasi |
≤ target |
| Clarity |
Pemahaman responden |
≥ 80% |
Phase 5: Data Collection (Minggu 9-20)
5.1 Timeline
| Fase |
Aktivitas |
Durasi |
| Bulan 5-7 |
Survey distribution |
3 bulan |
| Bulan 4-6 |
Interview & FGD |
3 bulan |
| Bulan 3-5 |
Dokumen collection |
3 bulan |
| Bulan 5-7 |
Observasi |
3 bulan |
5.2 Data Management
| Komponen |
Sistem |
Backup |
| Survey |
Google Forms/Qualtrics |
Excel, SPSS |
| Interview |
Recording + transcript |
NVivo project file |
| FGD |
Recording + transcript |
NVivo project file |
| Dokumen |
Digital archive |
Cloud storage |
Phase 6: Data Analysis (Minggu 18-28)
6.1 Quantitative Analysis
| Tahap |
Analisis |
Tools |
| 1. Data Cleaning |
Missing values, outliers |
SPSS |
| 2. Descriptive |
Mean, SD, frequency |
SPSS |
| 3. Assumptions |
Normality, multicollinearity |
SPSS |
| 4. Reliability |
Cronbach’s Alpha |
SPSS |
| 5. Validity |
CFA |
AMOS |
| 6. Hypothesis Testing |
SEM/Path Analysis |
AMOS/PLS |
6.2 Qualitative Analysis
| Tahap |
Analisis |
Tools |
| 1. Transcription |
Interview/FGD verbatim |
Manual |
| 2. Coding |
Open, axial, selective |
NVivo |
| 3. Thematic Analysis |
Pattern identification |
NVivo |
| 4. Cross-case Analysis |
Pattern matching |
Manual |
6.3 Integration
| Metode |
Deskripsi |
| Convergence |
Bandingkan temuan QUAN & QUAL |
| Complementarity |
Saling melengkapi |
| Expansion |
Extend understanding |
Phase 7: Framework Refinement (Minggu 26-32)
7.1 Refinement Process
| Tahap |
Aktivitas |
Output |
| 1. Integration |
Gabungkan QUAN & QUAL |
Integrated findings |
| 2. Validation |
Expert review |
Revised framework |
| 3. Finalization |
Expert consensus |
Final framework |
7.2 Framework Components
| Komponen |
Aspek yang Diperkuat |
| CG |
Mekanisme koordinasi, indicators |
| TH |
Governance implementation |
| NTM |
Integration dengan CG/IE |
| IE |
Metrics, pathway |
| Integration |
Feedback loops, outcomes |
Phase 8: Draft Writing (Minggu 28-40)
8.1 Chapter Structure
| Chapter |
Judul |
Estimasi Halaman |
| 1 |
Introduction |
15-20 |
| 2 |
Literature Review |
40-50 |
| 3 |
Conceptual Framework |
20-25 |
| 4 |
Methodology |
20-25 |
| 5 |
Results (QUAN) |
30-40 |
| 6 |
Results (QUAL) |
25-35 |
| 7 |
Discussion |
20-25 |
| 8 |
Conclusions & Recommendations |
15-20 |
| Appendices |
Instruments, data |
30-40 |
| Total |
|
215-280 |
8.2 Writing Timeline
| Minggu |
Chapter |
Milestone |
| 28-30 |
Chapter 1-2 |
Introduction & Literature Review |
| 30-32 |
Chapter 3-4 |
Framework & Methodology |
| 32-36 |
Chapter 5-6 |
Results |
| 36-38 |
Chapter 7-8 |
Discussion & Conclusion |
| 38-40 |
Revision |
Final draft |
Phase 9: Expert Review & Revision (Minggu 38-44)
9.1 Review Process
| Tahap |
Reviewer |
Output |
| 1. Internal |
Promotor, ko-promotor |
Comments |
| 2. External |
Expert validation panel |
Comments |
| 3. Revision |
Address all comments |
Revised draft |
9.2 Revision Timeline
| Minggu |
Aktivitas |
| 38-40 |
Internal review |
| 40-42 |
External review |
| 42-44 |
Revision |
Phase 10: Finalization & Defense (Minggu 44-52)
10.1 Final Steps
| Tahap |
Aktivitas |
Timeline |
| 1. Final Proofreading |
Typo, grammar, format |
Minggu 44-46 |
| 2. Binding & Submission |
Cetak, submit |
Minggu 46-48 |
| 3. Defense Preparation |
PPT, latihan |
Minggu 48-50 |
| 4. Defense |
Ujian |
Minggu 50-52 |
Resource Requirements
1. Human Resources
| Peran |
Jumlah |
Tanggung Jawab |
| Peneliti Utama |
1 |
Koordinasi, analisis |
| Asisten Peneliti |
2 |
Data collection, coding |
| Statistician |
1 |
Analisis kuantitatif |
2. Budget Estimation
| Komponen |
Estimasi (IDR) |
Keterangan |
| Survey |
15-20 juta |
Platform, distribusi |
| Interview |
10-15 juta |
Recording, transkripsi |
| FGD |
8-10 juta |
Venue, transport |
| Expert |
10-15 juta |
Honor, transport |
| Software |
5-8 juta |
NVivo, SPSS, AMOS |
| Others |
5-10 juta |
Printing, misc |
| Total |
53-78 juta |
|
3. Tools & Software
| Tool |
Keperluan |
Lisensi |
| SPSS/AMOS |
Analisis kuantitatif |
Institutional |
| NVivo |
Analisis kualitatif |
Institutional |
| Google Forms |
Survey online |
Free |
| Zoom |
Interview/FGD online |
Institutional |
| Mendeley/Zotero |
Reference management |
Free |
Risk Management
| Risk |
Probability |
Impact |
Mitigation |
| Low response rate |
Medium |
High |
Multiple reminders, incentives |
| Expert availability |
High |
Medium |
Flexible scheduling, backup experts |
| Data quality |
Medium |
High |
Validation, triangulation |
| Timeline delay |
High |
Medium |
Buffer time, parallel tasks |
| Budget overrun |
Low |
Medium |
Contingency fund (10%) |
Key Milestones
| Milestone |
Target |
Status |
| Methodology Finalized |
Minggu 4 |
Pending |
| Instruments Ready |
Minggu 6 |
Pending |
| Expert Validation Complete |
Minggu 8 |
Pending |
| Pilot Study Complete |
Minggu 10 |
Pending |
| Data Collection Complete |
Minggu 20 |
Pending |
| Data Analysis Complete |
Minggu 28 |
Pending |
| Framework Finalized |
Minggu 32 |
Pending |
| Draft Complete |
Minggu 40 |
Pending |
| Defense Ready |
Minggu 52 |
Pending |
Success Criteria
| Criterion |
Indicator |
Target |
| Academic |
Q1/Q2 publications |
2+ papers |
| Practical |
Framework adoption |
1+ organization |
| Policy |
Policy brief accepted |
1+ recommendation |
| Impact |
GII improvement |
+5 ranking (long-term) |
Next Actions (Immediate)
Minggu 1-2
- [ ] Finalisasi research questions
- [ ] Desain research framework
- [ ] Identifikasi sampel awal
Minggu 3-4
- [ ] Develop survey questionnaire
- [ ] Develop interview guide
- [ ] Siapkan FGD guide
Minggu 5-6
- [ ] Expert validation (Delphi Round 1)
- [ ] Revisi instrumen
- [ ] Siapkan pilot study
Created: July 2026
Last Updated: July 2026
Status: Active Planning