Metrics & Indicators Innovation Ecosystem

Metrics & Indicators Innovation Ecosystem

1. Global Innovation Index (GII) 2025

1.1 Methodology

Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2025 URL: https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2025/en/appendix-i-conceptual-and-measurement-framework-of-the-global-innovation-index.html

Coverage: 132 economies Indicators: 80 total (38 input, 42 output)

1.2 Seven Pillars

Pillar Indicators Sub-indices
1. Institutions 8 Political & regulatory environment, Business environment
2. Human Capital & Research 8 Education, Tertiary education, R&D
3. Infrastructure 7 ICT, General infrastructure, Ecological sustainability
4. Market Sophistication 7 Credit, Investment, Trade, Competition, Market scale
5. Business Sophistication 8 Knowledge workers, Innovation linkages, Knowledge absorption
6. Knowledge & Technology Outputs 9 Knowledge creation, Impact, Knowledge diffusion
7. Creative Outputs 6 Intangible assets, Creative goods & services, Online creativity

1.3 Indonesia GII 2025

Metric Rank Score Category
Overall GII #56 35.6 Upper middle income
Innovation Input #52 38.2 Above average
Innovation Output #62 33.0 Below average

Perubahan dari 2024: - 2024: Rank #59 (score 34.6) - 2025: Rank #56 (score 35.6) - Peningkatan: +3 posisi, +1.0 poin

Kekuatan Indonesia (Top 20)

Pillar Rank Score Keterangan
Market Sophistication #35 46.5 Strength
Business Sophistication #43 40.2 Strength
Infrastructure #62 35.4 Average
Institutions #68 32.1 Below average
Human Capital & Research #78 28.5 Weakness
Creative Outputs #82 27.8 Weakness
Knowledge & Technology Outputs #91 22.3 Critical weakness

Gap Utama

Gap Current Target (2045) Strategi
Knowledge Outputs #93 Top 30 R&D intensity, university-industry collaboration
Technology Outputs #88 Top 30 Patent commercialization, tech transfer
Human Capital #78 Top 40 DBMTN, STEM education

1.4 Sub-indices Detail

Innovation Input Sub-indices

Sub-index Rank Score Key Indicators
Political & regulatory environment #65 33.2 Political stability, Regulatory quality
Business environment #71 30.8 Ease of doing business, Credit access
Education #82 27.5 School enrollment, PISA scores
Tertiary education #75 29.1 University enrollment, STEM graduates
R&D #85 25.3 R&D expenditure, Researchers
ICT #68 31.5 Internet users, Mobile subscriptions
General infrastructure #59 36.2 Logistics, Transport
Ecological sustainability #72 29.8 CO2 emissions, Energy

Innovation Output Sub-indices

Sub-index Rank Score Key Indicators
Knowledge creation #88 23.5 Patents, Scientific articles
Knowledge impact #92 21.8 Labor productivity, GDP growth
Knowledge diffusion #95 20.2 FDI, Technology balance
Intangible assets #79 28.1 Trademarks, Industrial designs
Creative goods & services #85 26.5 Cultural exports, Creative industries
Online creativity #76 29.3 Apps, Digital content

2. StatCan Innovation Ecosystem Performance Indicators (IEP)

2.1 Methodology

Source: Statistics Canada (2024) URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-633-x/11-633-x2024003-eng.htm

Approach: Two types of indicators: 1. Activity-related: Measures of innovation activity (patents, R&D, collaboration) 2. Outcome/Impact: Measures of innovation outcomes (productivity, growth, employment)

2.2 Key Indicators

Category Indicator Description
Innovation Activity R&D expenditure % of GDP spent on R&D
Innovation Activity Patent applications Number of patent applications filed
Innovation Activity Trademark registrations Number of trademark registrations
Collaboration University-industry R&D % of R&D conducted jointly
Collaboration Knowledge transfer Number of technology licenses
Outcome Labor productivity GDP per hour worked
Outcome High-tech exports % of manufactured exports
Outcome Innovation employment % of employment in innovation sectors

2.3 Relevance for Indonesia

StatCan Indicator Indonesia Data Gap
R&D expenditure (% GDP) 0.28% (2023) Below OECD average (2.7%)
Patent applications 15,000/year Below Singapore (20,000)
University-industry R&D 18% (Shofiyani 2026) Below target 40%
High-tech exports 6.5% of manufacturing Below target 15%

3. MIT REAP (Regional Entrepreneurship Acceleration Program)

3.1 Framework

Source: MIT REAP URL: https://reap.mit.edu/assets/Assessing-iEcosystems.pdf

Approach: Systematic assessment of innovation-driven entrepreneurship ecosystems

3.2 Five Dimensions

Dimension Description Key Metrics
Talent Human capital availability STEM graduates, Researchers, Entrepreneurs
Capital Financial resources VC investment, Angel investors, Government grants
Knowledge Research & development R&D expenditure, Patents, Publications
Culture Entrepreneurial culture Risk tolerance, Success stories, Role models
Connectivity Networks & collaboration Industry-academia links, Clusters, Global connections

3.3 Assessment Framework

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    MIT REAP ASSESSMENT                       │
│                                                               │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│  │                    TALENT                                ││
│  │  • STEM graduates per 100k population                   ││
│  │  • Researchers per million population                   ││
│  │  • Brain drain/gain ratio                               ││
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│                                                               │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│  │                    CAPITAL                               ││
│  │  • VC investment as % of GDP                            ││
│  │  • Government R&D grants                                ││
│  │  • Angel investor density                               ││
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│                                                               │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│  │                    KNOWLEDGE                             ││
│  │  • R&D expenditure as % of GDP                          ││
│  │  • University research output                           ││
│  │  • Technology transfer rate                             ││
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│                                                               │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│  │                    CULTURE                               ││
│  │  • Entrepreneurship rate                                ││
│  │  • Failure tolerance                                    ││
│  │  • Role model visibility                                ││
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│                                                               │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│  │                    CONNECTIVITY                          ││
│  │  • Industry-academia partnerships                       ││
│  │  • Cluster density                                      ││
│  │  • Global network integration                           ││
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

4. Perbandingan Metrik

Framework Input Metrics Output Metrics Context
GII 38 indicators 42 indicators 132 economies
StatCan IEP Activity indicators Outcome indicators Canada
MIT REAP 5 dimensions Ecosystem health Regional

5. Rekomendasi Metrik untuk Penelitian

5.1 Metrik Utama

Metrik Sumber Target Relevansi
R&D Expenditure (% GDP) GII, StatCan 2% by 2030 Innovation input
STEM Graduates (% workforce) GII 25% by 2030 Human capital
Patent Applications GII 50,000/year by 2030 Knowledge creation
University-Industry R&D StatCan 40% by 2030 Collaboration
VC Investment (% GDP) MIT REAP 0.5% by 2030 Capital
High-tech Exports GII 15% by 2030 Knowledge diffusion

5.2 Metrik Kualitatif

Metrik Metode Sumber
Budaya Inovasi Survey, Interview MIT REAP
Kolaborasi Triple Helix Case Study TH Framework
Kebijakan Inovasi Document Analysis GII Institutions

6. Daftar Pustaka

  1. WIPO (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2025/
  2. Statistics Canada (2024). Innovation Ecosystem Performance Indicators. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-633-x/11-633-x2024003-eng.htm
  3. MIT REAP (2023). Assessing Innovation Ecosystems. https://reap.mit.edu/assets/Assessing-iEcosystems.pdf
  4. Shofiyani et al. (2026). Triple Helix challenges in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation Ecosystems.